Dark matter does not exist and the universe is 27 billion years old, study claims




The universe has always been full of mysteries that ignite our curiosity. So far, scientists believe it’s made up of three main ingredients: *normal matter*, *dark energy*, and *dark matter*. But new research is challenging this familiar picture.  


Leading the charge is Rajendra Gupta, a seasoned physics professor known for thinking outside the box. With years of research behind him, Gupta is offering fresh ideas that could transform how we understand the universe at its core.


Rajendra Gupta, a professor at the University of Ottawa, has put forth a groundbreaking study suggesting that dark matter and dark energy may not be necessary to explain the universe’s behavior. This bold idea is generating significant buzz within the scientific community.  


### “Tired Light” and the CCC Model  

At the heart of Gupta’s research lies a novel approach that merges two intriguing theories: **Tired Light (TL)** and **Covarying Coupling Constants (CCC)**. Together, these concepts offer a fresh perspective on cosmic phenomena, challenging long-standing assumptions about how the universe works.



We’ve long believed that the fundamental constants of nature—like the speed of light or the charge of an electron—remain unchanged. But what if they aren’t as fixed as we thought?  


The **Covarying Coupling Constants (CCC)** theory proposes that these constants might actually vary across the universe. If true, this could transform how we understand everything, from subatomic particles to massive galaxies.  


Then there’s the **Tired Light (TL)** concept. Traditionally, we attribute the redshift of light from distant galaxies—where light stretches into longer, redder wavelengths—to the expansion of the universe. But the tired light theory offers a different explanation: light could lose energy over time as it travels through space, without requiring an expanding universe to account for the redshift.


But the **Tired Light (TL)** model suggests something different: perhaps light gradually loses energy as it travels across immense distances. This loss of energy could explain the redshift we observe, without relying on the idea of an expanding universe.  


So, what happens when you combine these two ideas? The **CCC + TL model** offers a fresh framework for interpreting the cosmos. By allowing the fundamental constants to vary and proposing an alternative explanation for redshift, this model could reshape our understanding of how the universe functions.


By suggesting that fundamental constants might change and light could lose energy over time, the **CCC + TL model** offers new explanations for cosmic observations that have baffled scientists for decades.  


### Why Most Scientists Believe in Dark Matter  

So, why do scientists still believe in dark matter if we can’t directly observe it? The idea dates back to the 1930s when astronomer **Fritz Zwicky** noticed something strange. Galaxies within a cluster were moving much faster than expected, given the amount of visible matter present. This led Zwicky to propose the existence of an unseen “dark” matter, providing the extra gravitational pull needed to explain the rapid motion.


Something unseen appeared to be exerting a gravitational pull on the galaxies. Since then, additional evidence has emerged—such as the way galaxies rotate. They spin much faster than they should if only visible matter were at play.  


Most theories suggest that **dark matter** plays a crucial role in the universe’s structure. It seems to act as an invisible glue, holding galaxies together. Without it, galaxies wouldn’t have enough mass to stay intact and would likely fall apart.  


Dark matter also influences the way light travels through space, bending it through a process called **gravitational lensing**. This bending effect helps scientists map out areas where dark matter might be lurking, even though we can’t directly observe it.



### Questioning the Need for Dark Matter  


For decades, dark matter has been the leading explanation for the behavior of galaxies and the motion of stars. It’s also tied to the widely accepted estimate that the universe is about **13.8 billion years old**.  


According to standard models, dark matter is thought to make up roughly **27%** of the universe, with ordinary matter making up less than **5%**, and the remaining **68%** attributed to dark energy.  


However, **Gupta’s findings challenge this framework**. If his model is correct, we might not need dark matter or dark energy to explain the universe’s behavior, potentially forcing us to rethink everything we thought we knew about the cosmos.



“The study’s findings support our earlier work, which proposed that the universe is actually **26.7 billion years old**, eliminating the need for dark matter,” Gupta explains.  


“Contrary to conventional cosmological theories that attribute the universe's accelerated expansion to dark energy, our results suggest that this expansion is caused by the weakening forces of nature, rather than dark energy,” he adds.  


### Redshifts and Cosmic Observations  

A key aspect of Gupta’s research centers on **redshifts**, a phenomenon where light stretches toward the red end of the spectrum as it travels through space. Understanding redshifts is crucial for interpreting cosmic observations and can provide valuable insights into the universe's structure and behavior.



By examining data on the distribution of galaxies at low redshifts alongside patterns observed in the early universe at high redshifts, Gupta constructs a compelling argument against the existence of dark matter.  


“There have been several studies that question the existence of dark matter, but to my knowledge, mine is the first that eliminates its cosmological role while remaining consistent with key cosmological observations that we have been able to confirm,” Gupta confidently asserts.



### What Does The entirety of This Mean?


If the **CCC + TL model** is approved, it could change a lot of our ongoing comprehension of the universe. It could give new clarifications to peculiarities, for example, the **cosmic microwave foundation radiation** and the arrangement and development of universes.


Gupta's hypothesis represents an immediate test to the broadly acknowledged **Big Bang theory**, which fills in as the establishment for assessing the universe's age at roughly **13.8 billion years**. This change in context could prepare for new roads of thought in cosmology, provoking researchers to reexamine laid out ideas and investigate elective clarifications for the universe's secrets.



Critics argue that there is a substantial body of evidence supporting current models, such as the constancy of physical laws and the observed expansion of the universe.  


For the **CCC + TL model** to gain traction, it must produce testable predictions that can be confirmed or disproven through observations and experiments. Without this empirical validation, the model may struggle to convince the scientific community to abandon well-established theories in favor of a radically new perspective.



### Dim Matter, Huge explosion, and Following stages


Anyway, what's straightaway? Are dull energy and dim matter only builds made by researchers to help their Theory of prehistoric cosmic detonation? Might it at any point be that the universe is really **26.7 billion years old** rather than the ordinarily acknowledged **13.8 billion years**?


Analysts are effectively investigating strategies to test the **CCC + TL model**. They are inspecting far off stars, estimating astronomical radiation, and dissecting tremendous measures of information to reveal proof that could uphold or discredit this new structure. These examinations will be critical in deciding if Gupta's model can tolerate upping to the thorough investigation of logical approval.



As technology progresses, particularly with the development of more powerful telescopes and detectors, we may collect the evidence necessary to either confirm or challenge these emerging theories.  


Ultimately, the quest to understand the universe resembles piecing together a massive puzzle without a clear picture of the final result. Each new piece or idea brings us closer to the truth, even if it requires us to rethink aspects we once believed we understood.



Whether the **CCC + TL model** turns into a foundation of cosmology or leads us to other noteworthy disclosures, it addresses a thrilling section in our mission to grasp the universe.